What leadership is a leadership style that involves making managerial decisions without consulting others?
Are you the “right” type of leader? Show
The answer to that question might surprise you. No, you’re not. Guess what? There’s no one right type of leader. Everyone has multiple types of leadership within them. All of the different types of leadership in you can appear at separate times or multiple at once. The better questions to ask yourself are:
Different situations call for different types of leadership. A good leader can switch between those leadership types when they need to. And typically, every leader will need to, because one size does not fit all businesses. What types of leadership are the best? Here are 10 of them to help you decide what type of leader you want to be. The top 10 types of leadership styles
Being a leader doesn’t always mean you’re the official head of a company or of a team. You can be a leader in smaller ways, like when you:
Whatever leadership situation you’re in, know how you want to lead – and how others need you to lead. The 10 types of common leadership styles are:
1. Autocratic Leader“My way or the highway.” Autocratic leadership (sometimes called authoritarian) is an aggressive leadership style that’s based on control. This style of strong-willed leadership only leaves room for one person in charge. This often leaders to a more transactional leadership style. The transactional leader only cares about getting a goal accomplished and little else. A person with an autocratic leadership style expects promptness and perfection from the people around them. These are things you don’t see much of in an autocratic-led environment:
An autocratic leadership style is not meant to be flexible. It enforces a strict, obedient environment, which is why it works well in situations that benefit from a lot of control. Examples include:
The ability to make decisive, crucial calls is the key trait of an autocratic leader. Autocratic leaders aren’t always well liked, but sometimes an autocratic leader is what the job requires. A strong hand in business can build an idea into a strong, thriving company. Have you ever heard of Helen Gurley Brown? Maybe not, but chances are that you’ve heard of Cosmopolitan magazine. Helen Gurley Brown was the former editor-in-chief of Cosmopolitan, and was known as someone who thrived on getting things done with little room for error. This autocratic style led her to turn a profit in publishing for more than 3 decades. Some call an autocratic approach to leadership dictatorial or controlling, but a little bit of this type of leadership can be an asset when you use it well. 2. Democratic LeaderDemocratic leadership is a participative style of leading that involves a team of people who collaborate with a leader to make critical decisions. This type of leadership style is very different from autocratic leadership – because with a democratic approach you DO get these things:
Democratic leadership gives you a range of ideas to choose from, and a team to consult when making your decision. A democratic approach to leadership is definitely one of the better-liked types of leadership in business. The Mayo Clinic thrives on a democratic leadership style. This hospital, healthcare, and research facility brings in some of the brightest minds in medicine because its democratic leadership creates a collaborative environment. Dr William Mayo, along with his sons, founded the Mayo Clinic in 1889 to give cutting-edge medical research around the world in a non-profit style. Mayo Clinic is a success because people’s ideas and opinions are listened to. People want to work there because it focuses on giving everyone an equal voice.
Therefore, the medical facility the family set up didn’t turn away experts or ignore what they were saying. The family understood that transformation of healthcare requires fresh thinking and collective knowledge. Mayo understands the need to combine different levels of knowledge. The hospital doesn’t subscribe to the idea that a single expert can make the right decisions. 3. Laissez-faire LeaderDon’t like to micro-manage people? Laissez-faire leadership takes the opposite approach. This type of leadership is a hands-off style, where delegating tasks is a regular occurrence. The literal meaning of the French word laissez-faire is ‘let them do’ which can be translated as ‘let it be’ in English. Donna Karan, the founder of the DKNY jeans and apparel company, DKNY jeans and apparel, has a reputation for being an attentive, hands-off leader. Karan keeps her eyes on profits while she follows fashion trends. She trusts managers to make good decisions while she periodically monitors performance and offers ongoing feedback. As a laissez-faire leader, Donna Karan:
A laissez-faire leader lets people work how they need to, with little to no interference. Leaders who use this style often lead people who are skilled enough to not need constant supervision – which leaves the door open for creative ideas and new ways of doing things. The one downside to a completely laissez-faire environment is that it can lack the structure that other leadership styles offer. Some business situations have hard deadlines and demanding quality standards that don’t match well to laissez-faire leadership. Of course, you still have to be a leader. If you are this type of leader, make sure you still monitor your team’s overall performance to note any problems that may arise. In his book High Output Management, legendary Intel CEO Andy Grove discusses two styles of management:
Laissez-faire management avoids gate-like inspections in favor of speed, but monitoring helps keep the manager aware of the progress of work. 4. Coaching LeaderA coaching style of leadership is a bit of a cross between democratic and laissez-fare leadership styles. It’s not micromanaging (but not totally hands-off, either) and actions are often decided with multiple inputs to consider. In a nutshell, coaching leadership helps prepare people for the future by building long-term strengths. Much like the coach of a sports team, a coach-style leader can quickly identify the strengths, weaknesses, and motivations of each team member. A coach then helps people set the best goals to work towards, and gives them the regular feedback they need to be successful. A good coaching leader is able to:
A coaching style is a significant time investment because it:
Plus, it can take more time to see the results of your efforts. Bill Walsh, head coach of the San Francisco 49ers, is the epitome of a coaching leadership style because…well, he’s an actual coach. Bill Walsh took a disorganized team on a losing streak and led them to 5 Super Bowl championships in 14 years. In his book, The Score Takes Care of Itself, Bill writes that “the prime directive was not victory.” In sports, you’d think victory is the only directive. Instead, Bill focused on developing his player’s skills along with a strong team culture to improve overall performance. It worked: In Walsh’s first season as head coach, the 49ers went 2–14 (2 wins, 14 losses), the worst team in the league. In his third season, they won the Super Bowl.
5. Transformational LeaderTransformational leadership is a style that’s all about big vision thinking and intellectual stimulation to create a thriving, openly communicative work culture. Transformational leaders:
A transformational leader is common in big business, where the CEO is a visionary with a large audience – an audience that’s receptive to innovative thinking. Transformational leaders go over well in tech companies but can exist across multiple industries. The one thing to note about a transformational leader is that day-to-day details are not their priority. Transformational leaders need dedicated managers to delegate these types of tasks. Being a transformational leader requires you to:
Lee Iacocca, the chairman of Chrysler Corporation, is a great example of a transformational leader. He took a company on the brink of bankruptcy and transformed it into a profitable business. Iacocca rose through the ranks at Ford and is still called the father of the Ford Mustang today. After a falling out and firing from Ford, he became the CEO of Chrysler. There he was responsible for one of the biggest company turnarounds in corporate history. He later wrote a book, “Where Have All the Leaders Gone?” which outlines the 10 C’s he uses to qualify a leader (all of which he used in his own transformational leadership style).
6. Charismatic LeaderA charismatic leader automatically or intelligently attracts people just by being their own charming selves. These types of people are:
The success or failure of a business heavily relies on the leader with the charismatic approach. It’s seen as more of a one-man show than a collaborative team effort. Jack Welch, who in 1981 became the youngest CEO in General Electric (GE) history, was a charismatic leader. Welch made it a point to develop positive relationships with his GE employees and customers. He talked personally with employees. Welch was a strong leader and unafraid to make hard decisions or cut costs when necessary, but his leadership style instilled a sense of pride in the company. Welch would make surprise visits to the GE plants and offices. He always looked for opportunities to talk to people and share his perspective on leadership and what direction he thought the company should go. He was well-known for the personal handwritten notes he gave employees to congratulate (or correct) them. 7. Bureaucratic LeaderThe Cambridge dictionary defines the word bureaucratic as “a system for controlling or managing a country, company, or organization that is operated by a large number of officials employed to follow the rules carefully.” In a business, a bureaucratic leader uses strict rules for employee management and decision-making. You can use bureaucratic leadership most often in administrative environments, where strict rule-following and a defined hierarchy are important. Winston Churchill was a bureaucratic leader — he had a structured system to make sure that people carried out their tasks as planned. Throughout World War 2, Churchill followed his instincts and stuck to his hard decision-making abilities when bringing the three Allies together. During the early days of World War 2 Churchill attacked with words more than weapons. The speeches he gave were some of the most powerful ever given in the English language. His words were
As journalist Beverly Nichols wrote: “He took the English language and sent it into battle.” Churchill was extremely persistent in seeing his plans through (often against all odds). He was also a meticulous, detail-oriented leader – traits that most bureaucratic leaders have. He always wanted to know everything going on in all aspects of government. 8. Visionary LeaderVisionary leaders are motivated by what a business can become. They are not preoccupied with technical details: they focus on big-picture, innovative thinking. Leaders who execute this style are tasked with moving the company into a broader direction, as they promote unity and the tenacity to push through times of uncertainty. Few business leaders do this better than Sara Blakely. Sara Blakely is the founder and CEO of Spanx, which sells “the largest selection of slimming intimates, body shapers, hosiery, apparel, and the latest innovations in shapewear for men and women.” But she didn’t always do that. After seven years of selling fax machines door-to-door, one day she cut the feet off her pantyhose and realized she had a viable product: a slimming, seamless undergarment that no one would know you were wearing. She took a risk with her $5,000 life savings (and a lot of failures) to pursue her vision for what would become her Spanx empire. Most great and successful leaders have some sort of vision for where they are going. However, some have more vision than others. Outstanding visionary leaders always transform their visions into realities.
9. Pacesetter LeaderThe pacesetter is one of the most effective types of leadership if you need fast results. These leaders set very high standards, with a focus on performance. They hold their team members accountable for hitting their goals. Although it can be a motivational leadership style when in a fast-paced environment, it doesn’t give much space (or time) for feedback between leaders and team members. Pacesetter leaders expect:
This kind of motivating style isn’t necessarily a bad tactic. But if you overdo it, a pacesetter leadership style can undercut morale and make people feel like they’re failing. Use it wisely. The best leaders often use more than one type of leadership. Jack Welch – the youngest CEO in General Electric history – was a pacesetting leader in addition to being a charismatic leader. He drove big results quickly but also kept in personal contact with his employees. 10. Servant LeaderA servant style of leadership is when someone works with a people-first mindset. A servant leader believes that team members produce their best work when they feel both professionally and personally satisfied. Because of their focus on employee satisfaction, they tend to achieve higher levels of respect. This type of leader is the kind of person to have regular one-on-one meetings to hear struggles, concerns, or new ideas. Servant leaders are focused on helping their teams play to their own strengths. Verne Harnesh, in his book Scaling Up, describes the leadership role of a great manager:
Any business can adopt this kind of leadership — it’s a great leadership style to boost morale and make people care about their work. It’s the exact leadership style that former CEO of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Cheryl Bachelder, exhibited during her 10-year chicken tender tenure. Bachelder literally wrote a book about this type of leadership – Dare to Serve: How to Drive Superior Results by Serving Others – which talks about the power of servant leadership to reinvent a company from the inside out. When she started as CEO in 2007, guest visits had been in decline for years, and restaurant sales and profit trends were negative. By 2014, sales were up 25% and profits were up 40%. Bachelder attributed her success to a conscious decision to create a new workplace – one where people were treated with respect and dignity, yet challenged to perform to their highest ability. Bachelder outlines her philosophy in a nutshell: “We needed to serve the people who have invested the most in Popeyes.” This meant Bachelder and her team shone the spotlight on restaurant owners, listening and responding to their needs. Self-serving leaders were filtered out as collaboration increased and people were valued. Conclusion: What’s the difference between traits and styles of leadership?Traits are the qualities that make you who you are. Styles of leadership are how you show those traits. More specifically…. Leadership traits are the individual characteristics that create a specific leadership style. To be adaptable across types of leadership styles, the traits that every leader needs are things like:
Leadership styles (like the ones discussed above) are the ways leaders use their respective traits. For even more help to find your best types of leadership, become an effective leader, develop your leadership approach, and learn more leadership techniques, here are some great books about leadership to check out:
What are 4 types of leadership styles?Types of Leadership Styles. Autocratic.. Democratic.. Laissez-faire.. Transformational.. What are the 7 leadership styles?There are seven common leadership styles in management, each of which has its place in a leader's toolkit:. Autocratic Leadership.. Pacesetting Leadership.. Transformational Leadership.. Coaching Leadership.. Democratic Leadership.. Affiliative Leadership.. Delegative Leadership.. Which leadership style is one that decision is reached by all those involved?Democratic leadership, also sometimes known as participative leadership, is a leadership style characterized by the leader's choice to involve team members in the decision-making process. In all decisions, the leader has the final say, but they make decisions according to the input they receive from his team.
When should autocratic leadership be used?Autocratic leadership works best in situations requiring error-free performance or urgent decisions and problems with time limitations or potential safety threats. To better understand autocratic leadership, you need to know the characteristics or core character traits exhibited by people with this leadership style.
|