Đánh giá samsung notebook 9 np900x3n-k01us 13.3 năm 2024
|
Item Show 507827Manufacturer4T9874colorLight titanBluetooth enabledYesCPU BrandInteldepth8-3/16 in.Display TypeLCDGraphics TypeSharedheight35/64 in.memory8 GBmemory typeDDR4 SDRAMmodeli5-7200UNumber of USB Ports2Operating SystemsWindows 10processorIntel Core i5Processor Speed (Base)2.5 GHzProduct LineNotebook 9Screen Size (Diagonal)13.3 in.Warranty1-Year LimitedWebcam IncludedYeswidth12-3/16 in.wireless connectivity802.11acLaptop Weight1.8 lbbrand nameSamsungEco Label StandardEPEAT SilvermanufacturerSAMSUNGquantity1USB Ports (Total): 1 x USB-C [up to 5Gbps, 4K display out with optional adapter, Charging] + 2 x USB 3.0
Input Devices
Power
Security and Safety
Certification
Included in Box
Under 1 kg. The 13.3-inch Samsung Notebook 9 Pen focuses on three strengths: weight, brightness, and S Pen support. The end result is a versatile convertible that's noticeably lighter than the competition and with a brighter display for improved outdoor visibility. The drawbacks, however, are hard to ignore and worth keeping in mind for anyone considering the $1300 flagship Samsung. Samsung may be the most well-known brand when it comes to smartphones, but the same can't be said when it comes to laptops. The South Korean manufacturer has a range of Ultrabooks and even gaming laptops that are often overlooked by consumers in favor of Dell, HP, Lenovo, and others. It's a shame because Samsung laptops tend to offer some unique advantages over the competition that home and office users may appreciate. Our review today focuses on the high-end 13.3-inch Notebook 9 NP930QAA convertible equipped with a Core i7-8550U CPU, 1080p touchscreen, 256 GB M.2 PCIe SSD, and 8 GB of RAM for $1300 USD. There are no other SKUs available for U.S. customers other than the one we have here. The NP930QAA is notable for integrating the S Pen stylus while being extremely lightweight. Direct competitors include other 13-inch convertibles such as the Dell XPS 13 9365 2-in-1, HP Spectre x360 13, HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3, Lenovo Yoga C930, Acer Switch 7. Lenovo Yoga 730, and the ThinkPad X380 Yoga. The chassis design is nearly identical to the 2017 Notebook 9 NP900X3N and so many of our existing comments on the NP900X3N still apply here. The NP930QAA can be thought of as the convertible variant of the otherwise traditional NP900X3N. More Samsung reviews:
Memory 8 GB , 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel Display 13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, BOE075E, IPS, BOE NV133FHB-N33, glossy: yes Mainboard Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH Soundcard Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Connections 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer Networking Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2 Size height x width x depth (in mm): 16.5 x 310.4 x 206.5 ( = 0.65 x 12.22 x 8.13 in) Battery 39 Wh, 5120 mAh Lithium-Polymer Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Camera Webcam: 720p Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix Additional features Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Micro-USB to USB Type-C adapter, Samsung Update, Notes, Gallery, Recovery, PC Cleaner, 12 Months Warranty Weight 998 g ( = 35.2 oz / 2.2 pounds), Power Supply: 151 g ( = 5.33 oz / 0.33 pounds) Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. When closed, the chassis looks almost indistinguishable from the NP900X3N. The magnesium alloy surfaces remain and so does the matte silver color scheme. One notable change, however, is the new edge-to-edge glass overlay in order to support the touchscreen. This adds a bit more weight to the system, but the glass reinforces the lid for increased rigidity over the NP900X3N. Base rigidity is stronger than the LG Gram 13 but still weaker than both the Spectre x360 13 and XPS 13. Attempting to twist the base results in slightly more warping and creaking than on both the aforementioned Dell and HP. The keyboard center also warps more easily from applied pressure. The more flexible chassis here is the price to pay for having such a lightweight design. Construction quality is excellent from top to bottom with no unintended gaps or defects on our test unit. Hinges are uniformly firm and do not teeter when typing. One improvement we would make is to increase the grip along the front edge of the laptop as it is difficult to open the lid even with two hands. At just under 1 kg, the Notebook 9 NP930QAA is one of the lightest 13.3-inch convertibles available by several hundred grams over the competition. It even manages to weigh less than the XPS 13 2-in-1 while also being much faster. The super lightweight LG Gram 13 comes closest to our Samsung in terms of portability, but it lacks the versatile 2-in-1 form factor. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 DIN A4 333 mm / 13.1 inch 229 mm / 9.02 inch 17.05 mm / 0.671 inch 1.4 kg3.14 lbs320 mm / 12.6 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 15.4 mm / 0.606 inch 1.5 kg3.28 lbs310.4 mm / 12.2 inch 206.5 mm / 8.13 inch 16.5 mm / 0.65 inch 998 g2.2 lbs309 mm / 12.2 inch 208 mm / 8.19 inch 14 mm / 0.551 inch 817 g1.801 lbs306 mm / 12 inch 218 mm / 8.58 inch 13.6 mm / 0.535 inch 1.3 kg2.78 lbs304 mm / 12 inch 199 mm / 7.83 inch 13.7 mm / 0.539 inch 1.2 kg2.71 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs Available interfaces are the same as on the Notebook 9 NP900X3N albeit with one less USB 3.0 Type-A port. Users can recharge the laptop via USB Type-C even though the proprietary AC adapter port remains. Port positioning is otherwise excellent as ports are evenly distributed along the left and right edges of the chassis. The spring-loaded MicroSD reader is not any faster or slower than the MicroSD reader on the Notebook 9 NP900X3N. Transferring 1 GB worth of images from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes about 13 seconds compared to almost half that on the Spectre x360 13. A fully inserted MicroSD card sits flush against the edge of the notebook for safe transporting. The small card is a bit difficult to eject as a result. Samsung has upgraded the Intel 8260 as found on the 2017 Notebook 9 NP900X3N to the Intel 8265 for our Notebook 9 2-in-1. Nevertheless, most Ultrabooks are now shipping with the even faster Intel 9260 for 2x the theoretical transfer rates over our Samsung (1.73 Gbps vs. 867 Mbps). We didn't experience any connectivity issues during our time with the test unit. The bottom panel is secured by four Philips screws hidden underneath the rubber footing. It takes some patience to remove the panel since the latches are tight around the edges and corners. Most components are soldered including the WLAN and DDR4 RAM not unlike on the 2017 NP900X3N. Samsung throws in a small Micro-USB to USB Type-C adapter free of charge. A cleaning cloth would have been nice as well since the touchscreen will inevitably collect fingerprints. It's worth noting that the included 45 W AC adapter is the exact same adapter that comes with the 13.3-inch Notebook 9 NP900X3N. The standard one-year limited warranty applies. KeyboardKeyboard layout is identical to the NP900X3N including the dedicated fingerprint reader adjacent to the Enter key. We suspect that future revisions of this chassis will incorporate a power-fingerprint reader combo much like on the XPS 13 or MateBook X Pro. Key feedback is surprisingly firm with deeper travel than most other Ultrabooks including the XPS 13 and MateBook 13. Conversely, clatter is a bit louder and more high-pitched than on the Dell. The overall typing experience is excellent so long as users don't mind the clatter. The signature teal-green backlight returns in contrast to the white backlight on many competing Ultrabooks. Samsung claims that the teal-green color is easier on the eyes when working in dimly lit environments. The drawback, however, is that it's not as bright as a white backlight even when on the maximum brightness setting. The precision-enabled clickpad is exactly same size as on the NP900X3N (10 x 6 cm). It's much smaller than the clickpad on the MateBook 13 (12 x 6.5 cm) and so multi-touch inputs can feel cramped. Fortunately, glide is smooth with no sticking even when moving slowly for excellent cursor control. Cursor jumping, however, occurs more often than we would like when using multi-touch inputs. The integrated mouse keys have a loud audible click when pressed with shallow and firm feedback. In fact, we find the feedback to be firmer and louder than on the Spectre 13 or XPS 13. Nonetheless, the tendency for the cursor to jump impacts accuracy and the small clickpad surface area forces users to rely on the S Pen and touchscreen instead for longer sessions. Speaking of the S Pen, we find it much too thin to comfortably grip for long periods especially when compared to the Surface Pen. It's small size is acceptable for smartphone use, but we expected more from a convertible laptop. The S Pen is thus best for short and occasional use only and not for fast note-taking sessions or lengthy classes. Our Notebook 9 2-in-1 utilizes a very similar panel from BOE as the 2017 Notebook 9 NP900X3N. This time, however, the display is touchscreen and pressure sensitive with the included S Pen stylus. The edge-to-edge glass coating feels thinner here and less resilient than the displays on most tablets or the Spectre x360 13. Display impressions and properties are otherwise similar to the Notebook 9 NP900X3N. Brightness, color coverage, and contrast are nearly the same between the two laptops. One notable area of improvement is pulse-width modulation as its frequency is now much higher to impact fewer users who may be sensitive to onscreen flickering. We would have preferred it to be absent completely, but this is at least a step in the right direction. Speaking of brightness, the "Outdoor Mode" toggle returns to bump the backlight to a measured maximum of 473 nits for improved outdoor visibility. If toggled off, maximum brightness is only 350 nits. The results here are significantly brighter than the competing Spectre x360 13, XPS 13 2-in-1, and Lenovo Yoga C930 even though contrast suffers just a bit. Remember to disable 'Display Power Saving Technology' in order to take full advantage of the maximum backlight setting when running on batteries. Slight uneven backlight bleeding is present around the top corners of our unit as shown by the picture below. It's mostly unnoticeable even if viewing video with black borders. 443.4 cd/m²446.3 cd/m²430.3 cd/m²427.9 cd/m²473 cd/m²443.3 cd/m²417 cd/m²441.7 cd/m²445.3 cd/m² Distribution of brightness BOE075E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 Maximum: 473 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 440.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 88 % Center on Battery: 473 cd/m² Contrast: 830:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²) ΔE Color 3.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 2.14 ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3 90.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 66.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 91.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) Gamma: 2.31 Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA BOE075E, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Chi Mei (CMN1376), IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Lenovo LEN40A9, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080Display -25% 3% 6% -6% -3% Display P3 Coverage 65.4 47.32 -28% 66.2 1% 68.1 4% 60.9 -7% 63.4 -3% sRGB Coverage 91.5 71.1 -22% 97.4 6% 99.5 9% 86.4 -6% 88.6 -3% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage 66.2 48.83 -26% 68.1 3% 70.2 6% 61.9 -6% 64 -3% Response Times -28% -21% 250% 7% -34% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * 49.2 (33.2, 16) 48 (16.4, 31.6) 2% 52 (24.4, 27.6) -6% 36 (18, 18) 27% 40.4 (22.4, 18) 18% 41.6 (22.8, 18.8) 15% Response Time Black / White * 27.6 (17.6, 10) 32.8 (7.6, 25.2) -19% 37.2 (21.2, 16) -35% 27 (13, 14) 2% 28.8 (17.2, 11.6) -4% 34 (20, 14) -23% PWM Frequency 3049 (99) 1042 (29) -66% 25000 (40) 720% 210.1 (99) -93% Screen -14% 21% 7% -2% 9% Brightness middle 473 322.6 -32% 389.8 -18% 311 -34% 267.2 -44% 510.7 8% Brightness 441 306 -31% 396 -10% 278 -37% 239 -46% 481 9% Brightness Distribution 88 91 3% 88 0% 82 -7% 75 -15% 90 2% Black Level * 0.57 0.19 67% 0.27 53% 0.2 65% 0.27 53% 0.66 -16% Contrast 830 1698 105% 1444 74% 1555 87% 990 19% 774 -7% Colorchecker dE 2000 * 3.72 7.7 -107% 2.72 27% 3.98 -7% 3.5 6% 2.4 35% Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 7.83 11.1 -42% 5.49 30% 8.48 -8% 6.4 18% 7.3 7% Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * 2.14 1.25 42% 3.81 -78% Greyscale dE 2000 * 5.1 7.9 -55% 4.2 18% 5.57 -9% 1.3 75% 2.4 53% Gamma 2.31 95% 2.88 76% 2.1 105% 2.51 88% 2.146 103% 2.23 99% CCT 7569 86% 7044 92% 7470 87% 7810 83% 6523 100% 6747 96% Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) 58.9 44.1 -25% 62.2 6% 64 9% 56 -5% 57 -3% Color Space (Percent of sRGB) 90.8 69.9 -23% 98.2 8% 99 9% 86 -5% 88.1 -3% Total Average (Program / Settings) -22% /-19% 1% /12% 88% /52% -0% /-2% -9% /-2% * ... smaller is better Color space covers approximately 91 percent and 59 percent of the sRGB and AdobeRGB standards, respectively. While significantly better than budget panels where 60 to 70 percent sRGB is common, users who want full sRGB coverage may want to consider the HP Spectre x360 13 instead. Colors are fairly accurate out of the box, but color temperature is on the cool side and grayscale could have been better. Our calibration addresses these issues for a more color-accurate display overall. We recommend applying our ICC profile to get the most out of the panel. Display Response Timesℹ Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise ↘ 10 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33.2 ms rise ↘ 16 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹ To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether. Screen flickering / PWM detected 3049 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting The display backlight flickers at 3049 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 3049 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18578 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. Outdoor visibility is good when under shade because of the strong backlight. Direct sunlight, however, will still wash out the screen and accentuate glare. If outdoor visibility is of utmost importance, then users may want to consider the HP EliteBook x360 830 G5 and its 1000-nit display. Viewing angles are otherwise excellent as one would expect from an IPS panel. Contrast changes just slightly if viewing from very obtuse angles. The Kaby Lake-R Core i7-8550U and integrated UHD graphics 620 GPU are commonplace on mainstream Ultrabooks. Samsung has yet to make the transition to Whiskey Lake-U as of this writing, but we're not too concerned since the raw performance benefits over Kaby Lake-R are minimal at best. Users who want dedicated graphics options may have to consider giving up the convertible form factor for a more traditional 13.3-inch Huawei MateBook 13 or Asus ZenBook UX333. The Core i7-8550U in the Samsung is about 13 percent slower than the average i7-8550U in our database taken from a sample of 70+ other laptops. As a more extreme example, the XPS 13 with this same CPU is able to outperform our Samsung by 29 percent in multi-threaded workloads. While still faster than the last generation i5-7200U in the 2017 Notebook 9 NP900X3N by over 50 percent, Samsung's implementation of the i7-8550U here is substandard. We can observe why performance is so much lower than expected by running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop. The initial score of 530 points steadily drops to about 449 points for a performance loss of 15 percent due to thermal throttling. The XPS 13 with the same CPU is able to maintain faster clock rates albeit at warmer core temperatures than our Samsung. Since this is a convertible, we can understand why Samsung veered towards lower temperatures instead of maximizing Turbo Boost performance. See our dedicated page on the Core i7-8550U for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. 03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit 154 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit 530 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit 50.7 fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit 97.8 % Help PCMark 10 results are consistently higher than the last generation NP900X3N albeit just slightly. Ultrabooks with dedicated graphics, such as the Huawei MateBook 13, score much higher in Digital Content Creation where the extra GPU power is put to good use. We did not experience any crashes or performance abnormalities during our time with the test unit. PCMark 10 ScoreHuawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4344 Points +17% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3723 Points Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2629 - 4072, n=31) 3607 Points -3% Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3461 Points -7% Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 3449 Points -7% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 2945 Points -21% EssentialsHuawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 8382 Points +16% Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6628 - 9291, n=29) 7780 Points +8% Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 7666 Points +6% Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7509 Points +4% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 7217 Points HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 6741 Points -7% ProductivityHuawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7281 Points +4% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 7006 Points Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 6429 Points -8% Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4889 - 7006, n=29) 6175 Points -12% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 5745 Points -18% Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5099 Points -27% Digital Content CreationHuawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3645 Points +32% Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 2941 Points +6% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 2770 Points Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1506 - 3160, n=29) 2748 Points -1% Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 2260 Points -18% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 1791 Points -35% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3946 Points +12% Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 3728 Points +6% Huawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3616 Points +3% Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3024 - 4197, n=33) 3614 Points +3% HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK 3605 Points +2% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3525 Points Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK 3134 Points -11% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 2737 Points -22% Work Score Accelerated v2Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4823 Points +12% Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 4786 Points +11% Huawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4709 Points +9% Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK 4674 Points +9% Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3518 - 5154, n=27) 4585 Points +7% HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK 4463 Points +4% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4406 Points +2% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4303 Points Creative Score Accelerated v2HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK 4998 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4879 Points Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3381 - 5342, n=18) 4638 Points Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP 4577 Points Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK 4277 Points PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 3525 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 4303 pointsPCMark 10 Score 3723 points Help Naturally, the Samsung laptop is equipped with a Samsung SSD. This same PM961 SSD model can also be found on many other high-end laptops including the MS GS73 and Lenovo ThinkPad T480s. Transfer rates are significantly better than the SATA III-limited Samsung CM871a in our 2017 Notebook 9 NP900X3N but still almost twice as slow as the pricier Samsung PM981. Users can swap out the M.2 SSD without needing to puncture any stickers or warranty labels. See our table of SSDs and HDDs for more benchmark comparisons. Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPDell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUKHP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPLenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQSamsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHPAS SSD -23% 18% 17% -53% Seq Read 1824 1283 -30% 1693 -7% 2218 22% 520 -71% Seq Write 986 735 -25% 1214 23% 1840 87% 466 -53% 4K Read 41.84 37.69 -10% 42.69 2% 49.11 17% 31.24 -25% 4K Write 104.1 96.9 -7% 95.9 -8% 102.3 -2% 79.2 -24% 4K-64 Read 1196 586 -51% 1621 36% 1216 2% 379.4 -68% 4K-64 Write 739 204.7 -72% 605 -18% 1072 45% 223.8 -70% Access Time Read * 0.061 0.045 26% 0.051 16% 0.043 30% 0.066 -8% Access Time Write * 0.036 0.037 -3% 0.037 -3% 0.037 -3% 0.053 -47% Score Read 1420 752 -47% 1833 29% 1487 5% 463 -67% Score Write 941 375 -60% 823 -13% 1359 44% 350 -63% Score Total 3051 1495 -51% 3569 17% 3594 18% 1057 -65% Copy ISO MB/s 1103 950 -14% 1374 25% 917 -17% 335.9 -70% Copy Program MB/s 541 263.8 -51% 631 17% 233.5 -57% 213 -61% Copy Game MB/s 418.6 726 73% 971 132% 607 45% 186.8 -55% * ... smaller is better CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3114 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1211 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 330.1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 240.1 MB/s CDM 5 Write Seq: 1049 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.61 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.4 MB/s The common integrated UHD Graphics 620 holds no surprises here. Performance is within 5 percent of the average UHD Graphics 620 taken from our database of over 100 different laptop samples. Owners of older laptops equipped with the HD Graphics 620 aren't missing much as the gen-to-gen performance gain is extremely small. While we can understand why Samsung may want to exclude any discrete GeForce options to keep the weight low, it's too bad that there are no AMD Ryzen options. The integrated RX Vega 8 offers over 100 percent faster raw GPU power than the Intel solution. See our dedicated page on the UHD Graphics 620 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. 3DMark 111280x720 Performance GPUHuawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 4514 Points +164% Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U 3482 Points +104% Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U 3044 Points +78% Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1915 Points +12% Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1818 Points +6% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) 1749 Points +2% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1709 Points Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U 1536 Points -10% Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Intel HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75 1370 Points -20% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y 1088 Points -36% 1280x720 Performance CombinedHuawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 4163 Points +167% Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U 2683 Points +72% Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U 2597 Points +66% Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1755 Points +12% Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1653 Points +6% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) 1578 Points +1% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1562 Points Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U 1478 Points -5% Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Intel HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75 1313 Points -16% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y 872 Points -44% 3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsHuawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 21260 Points +124% Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U 15109 Points +59% Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U 14343 Points +51% Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 9974 Points +5% Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 9533 Points 0% Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 9501 Points Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) 9262 Points -3% Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U 8301 Points -13% Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Intel HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75 7839 Points -17% HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y 6692 Points -30% 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsHuawei MateBook 13 i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 3586 Points Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U 2328 Points Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U 2070 Points Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1283 Points Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1225 Points Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) 1161 Points Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U 967 Points Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Intel HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75 917 Points HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y 733 Points 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme GraphicsAcer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 54599 Points Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 47091 Points Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U 46817 Points Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (26409 - 59483, n=71) 42924 Points Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Intel HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75 42163 Points 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsApple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U 624 Points Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88) 389 Points Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 349 Points HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y 226 Points 3DMark 11 Performance 1892 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 7928 points Help The cooling solution appears to be identical to the 2017 NP900X3N. In order to keep weight low, the heat pipe is much shorter than on most other laptops. Fan noise and behavior remain unchanged from the NP900X3N. The convertible is silent during low loads like browsing or video streaming and users can expect a fan noise of just under 33 dB(A) during heavier loads not unlike on many competitors. At worst, we are able to record a fan noise of 36.7 dB(A) only when installing software or updates or running benchmarks. Our unit suffers from no noticeable electronic noise or coil whine. Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPHP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUKLenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQSamsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHPDell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512GHuawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQNoise -1% 1% 2% -1% -5% off / environment * 29 30.13 -4% 27.8 4% 28.4 2% 28 3% 28.6 1% Idle Minimum * 29 30.13 -4% 27.8 4% 28.4 2% 28 3% 28.6 1% Idle Average * 29 30 -3% 27.8 4% 28.4 2% 28 3% 28.6 1% Idle Maximum * 29 30.13 -4% 27.8 4% 28.4 2% 28 3% 28.6 1% Load Average * 32.6 33.4 -2% 33.9 -4% 33.2 -2% 32.5 -0% 34.2 -5% Load Maximum * 36.7 33 10% 39.9 -9% 35.2 4% 42.2 -15% 47 -28% Witcher 3 ultra * 43 * ... smaller is better Noise Level Idle 29 / 29 / 29 dB(A) Load 32.6 / 36.7 dB(A) 30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud min: Surface temperatures are flat when idling with the left half of the laptop being slightly warmer than the right at all times. Hot spots can become as warm as 40 C compared to 45 C to 47 C on the XPS 13 or even 50 C on the Spectre x360 13. The cooler CPU temperature and more reserved clock rates of the Samsung definitely give it the advantage in this regard. The palm rests remain cool for comfortable typing no matter the processing load. We stress the laptop with synthetic loads to identify for any potential throttling or stability issues. When subjected to Prime95 load, core clock rate can be as high as 3 GHz for the first few seconds before reaching a core temperature of 93 C. Afterwards, clock rate steadily drops to 1.9 to 2 GHz for a cooler core temperature of 75 C. This behavior mimics our CineBench R15 loop test above where scores are highest only during the first few loops before clock rates inevitably fall and stabilize over time. Since the base clock rate of the Core i7-8550U is 1.8 GHz, we're a bit disappointed that the convertible is only able to maintain a Turbo Boost of just +100 to 200 MHz. CPU performance is slightly lower when running on battery power. A 3DMark 11 run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 6481 points and 1721 points, respectively, compared to 5897 and 1709 points when on mains. CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) System Idle 39 Prime95 Stress 1.9 - 2.0 -- 77 Prime95 + FurMark Stress 897 650 76 35.6 °C 96 F37.4 °C 99 F29.2 °C 85 F 33.8 °C 93 F34.2 °C 94 F25.8 °C 78 F 24.4 °C 76 F25.2 °C 77 F23.6 °C 74 F Maximum: 37.4 °C = 99 F Average: 29.9 °C = 86 F 30 °C 86 F40.2 °C 104 F37 °C 99 F27.4 °C 81 F34.2 °C 94 F33.6 °C 92 F26.6 °C 80 F29.2 °C 85 F29.8 °C 86 F Maximum: 40.2 °C = 104 F Average: 32 °C = 90 F Power Supply (max.) 37 °C = 99 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer (+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible. (+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible. (±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F. (+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F). The stereo 1.5 W speakers are better than we were anticipating from a 13-inch convertible. Audio is balanced with decent bass reproduction and no static considering the small size. Maximum volume is loud enough to fill a small room, but it will vibrate the palm rests slightly. dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.939.62539.2373137.535.54036.5345034.735.76337.435.88033.53410033.333.512532.933.316031.238.820035.444.42503155.231531.160.540030.665.450029.665.663028.862.380028.369.3100028.468.5125027.965.2160027.965.5200027.961.8250027.956.2315027.858400027.867.1500027.962.7630027.771.8800027.671.71000027.669.81250027.561.21600027.462.5SPL40.378.9N3.944.9median 27.9median 62.5Delta1.45.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Notebook 9 NP930QAAApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices) Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (71.8 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median (±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median (±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median) Compared to same class » 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 23% worse » The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57% Compared to all devices tested » 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median (+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median (+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median) Compared to same class » 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse » The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53% Compared to all devices tested » 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% The system demands anywhere between 4 W and 16 W when idling on desktop depending on the brightness setting and Power profile compared to 10 W at most from its closest competitors. The higher demand can be attributed to the bright "Outdoor Mode" backlight as the difference between minimum and maximum brightness is almost 7 W. When gaming or running very high loads, consumption remains higher than than the competing Spectre x360 13 with the same CPU. We are able to measure a maximum consumption of 39.8 W from the very small (~6 x 6 x 3 cm) 45 W adapter. This is unsustainable, however, as consumption eventually drops and stabilizes at 29.5 W due to performance throttling as shown in our CineBench R15 loop test above. Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30Power Consumption 48% 42% 30% 18% 12% Idle Minimum * 4.4 3.1 30% 1.8 59% 3.2 27% 3 32% 3.8 14% Idle Average * 11.8 4.3 64% 3.8 68% 6 49% 5.4 54% 11 7% Idle Maximum * 15.5 4.9 68% 7.7 50% 9.2 41% 7.5 52% 11.3 27% Load Average * 38 24.3 36% 26.9 29% 29.5 22% 40.1 -6% 35.6 6% Load Maximum * 39.8 22.8 43% 38.5 3% 35.6 11% 57.1 -43% 37.2 7% * ... smaller is better The Notebook 9 NP930QAA continues the series trend of small battery capacities. At just 39 W, the battery in our Samsung 2-in-1 is significantly smaller than the 60 Wh and 54 Wh batteries as found on the Spectre x360 13 and ThinkPad X1 Yoga, respectively. We can at least applaud Samsung for upping the battery capacity when compared to the 30 Wh pack in the Notebook 9 NP900X3N. Battery life is average at 6.5 hours of real-world WLAN use. In comparison, the aforementioned HP and Lenovo laptops can last for 9 to 11 hours each when subjected to similar testing conditions. Charging from empty to full capacity with the included AC adapter takes about 2 hours. Battery Runtime Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)14h 33minWiFi Websurfing6h 38minLoad (maximum brightness)1h 9min Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 39 WhDell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 WhHP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 WhHP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 WhSamsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 WhBattery Runtime 79% 146% 87% 67% -21% Reader / Idle 873 971 11% 1882 116% 1218 40% 695 -20% WiFi v1.3 398 686 72% 852 114% 527 32% 651 64% 279 -30% Load 69 175 154% 212 207% 166 141% 135 96% 60 -13% Pros
Cons- very limited Turbo Boost potential; below average CPU performance - small battery capacity; average battery life - small S Pen is uncomfortable to hold - PWM on almost all brightness levels - no 1.73 Gbps WLAN or Bluetooth 5 - non-upgradeable WLAN and RAM - no Thunderbolt 3 - small clickpad The biggest reasons to own a Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA over alternatives like the HP Spectre x360 13 or Lenovo Yoga C930 are its integrated S Pen, very bright display, and extremely light weight. Users who frequently work while traveling or on-the-go will find the Samsung to be more versatile than the popular XPS 13 or Spectre series. Samsung had to cut some corners in order to make such a lightweight convertible. Since the cooling solution is so small, CPU Turbo Boost performance is limited and below average. Components and SKUs are also limited as RAM and WLAN are soldered and non-upgradeable. Battery capacity is smaller than usual for shorter battery life than the competition. Lastly, the base and lid are slightly more flexible than the Spectre 13, Zenbook UX333, or Blade Stealth. These are sacrifices that potential owners will have to keep in mind if they want the versatility of the Samsung convertible. One aspect that we think the Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA could have been better at is its S Pen. The stylus is just far too small and narrow for comfortable use. Taking notes on this machine for class or otherwise is significantly more cumbersome than on the Surface Pro, EliteBook x360, or even the Yoga C930. If you intend to use the NP930QAA as a note-taking workhorse, then we recommend trying out the S Pen first before committing to the $1300 purchase. Brighter and lighter than many competitors in the market today, the versatile Samsung Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA is an almost perfect travel companion for outdoor use and constant travelers. The small and uncomfortable S Pen puts a huge damper on the system compared to the stronger and larger styluses of the Surface Pro, EliteBook x360, or Yoga C930. Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA- 01/30/2019 v6(old) Allen Ngo Pointing Device 77 / 35-78 → 97% Application Performance 88 / 91 → 97% Convertible - Weighted Average More articles related to this deviceSamsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA (Notebook 9 Series) Related ArticlesPricecompareAllen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5170 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011 After graduating with a B.S. in environmental hydrodynamics from the University of California, I studied reactor physics to become licensed by the U.S. NRC to operate nuclear reactors. There's a striking level of appreciation you gain for everyday consumer electronics after working with modern nuclear reactivity systems astonishingly powered by computers from the 80s. When I'm not managing day-to-day activities and US review articles on Notebookcheck, you can catch me following the eSports scene and the latest gaming news. |
