Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

Looking for ways to better organize and lead your team? You may be surprised to find out that there are many different ways to achieve an organizational structure that improves team efficiency. 

A team structure defines the relationships between activities, leadership, and team members. While this may seem simple enough, team structures can have a huge impact on the distribution of authority and how teams collaborate and work together on a daily basis. 

Each organizational structure features a different chain of command and offers unique ways to encourage teamwork with the help of collaboration software. Likewise, each of these helps to form relationship dynamics and create a collegial work environment. 

From a functional structure to a flat structure, we’ll go over the 10 most effective ways to organize your team to help you find the right approach for your goals. 

1. Hierarchical structure

A hierarchical format is the basis of most organizational charts. A hierarchy is organized into a pyramid-like structure, with executives, directors, managers, and employees in order from the highest level to the lowest in the chain. This is by far the most widely used structure and creates clear boundaries between team members. 

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

By Process

Departmentalization can also take place by process. This type of structure is often found in large process or manufacturing companies,

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

By Product

Whenever specialized knowledge of certain products or services is needed, departmentalisation by product may be observed. This usually occurs in large diversified companies.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

By Market

When a need exists to provide better service to different types of markets, departmentalisation by market may be the appropriate form. Below is an example of a business serving non-profit markets, which uses the market form of departmentalisation,

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

By Customer

Sometimes key or major customers warrant departmentalisation by customers or groups of type of customers. This is often the case in banks, financial institutions or service industries such as marketing, advertising and insurance.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

By Geographic location

When organizations are spread throughout the world or have territories in many parts of a country, departmentalisation by geographic area may provide better service to customers and be more cost effective.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

Combination of Organization Structures

Divisional

In reality, organizations of any size may employ multiple types of structure using various combinations of the elements covered on the previous slides.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

Multiple

Many organizations, particularly large, physically dispersed and diversified organizations, utilize several different forms of departmentalization.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

Matrix

Departmentalization by matrix, or project, has received considerable use in recent years, particularly in such industries as aerospace (e.g., NASA). Staff with different backgrounds and experiences appropriate to the project are assembled and given the specific project to be accomplished within a certain time period.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

Other Aspects of Organizational Structure

A note on Centralization v decentralization

Centralization and decentralization involve the principle of delegation of authority. When a limited amount of authority is delegated in an organization, it is usually characterized as centralized. When a significant amount of authority is delegated to lower levels in the organization, the business is characterized as decentralized. Centralization and decentralization are opposites, and there are different degrees of each. In a highly centralized organization, employees at lower levels have a limited range of decision-making authority. The scope of authority to make decisions in decentralized organizations, by way of contrast, is very broad for lower level employees.

Is the process of dividing an organization into smaller teams or departments?

Emerging Organisational Structures

Each new generation of technology creates new opportunities to redesign or

rethink organizational structure. The acceleration of change requires flexible structures that can rapidly incorporate and adapt to technological and process changes.

Whilst backbone structures (such as the ones we have looked at in this document) focused on strategic management as well as provision of administrative and support functions will still exist; there will be a growing use of informal structures (task oriented), to include project teams (actual and virtual), matrix structures, collaboration networks, and others that work within and across the organizational hierarchy.

Technology fulfills the communication and coordination functions that once were accomplished through a formal chain of command. Organizations are no longer limited to one design presumed to be right for all circumstances. They can adopt whatever informal structures are needed to meet current operations and dismantle them when the requirements change. This enables large organizations to act like small ones in dealing with change. They do not have to overhaul a large infrastructure. Using informal structures, they can experiment and adapt on a small scale before making large resource commitments; they can also redirect personnel quickly and avoid the cost of overall restructuring.

Virtual Organization (Food for thought)

Organic or Open Organization

The usual goals for organizations are high productivity and efficiency.� Organizations are seen as reliable machines and employees are considered to be sub-machines or constituent parts of the machine.� This type of organization requires stable environment in which it operates and it is not subjected to rapid change and development.� The emergence of globalization and the high connectivity through telecommunication channels has on the one hand provided the firms with opportunity in the shape of new markets.� On the other hand, this also has its adverse consequences in that it encourages the threat of substitute products and services, usually from small and medium sized firms, operating in manufacturing and service industries and communities at much reduced costs.� The environment therefore becomes turbulent and subject to rapid change.� Well documented and established rules, stringent policies and procedures for business processes and manufacturing regimes become hurdles that undermine the ability of organization to adapt to the changes in the environment quickly and effectively.

Organic organization philosophy promotes the encouragement of creativity of individuals.� It is based on the hypothesis that productivity and adaptability to rapid change is increased when employees are placed at the centre of their environment and they are allowed to manage themselves and their resources.� When their creativity is accounted for and rewarded.� When their continuous development is encouraged through provision of opportunities and resources.�

This type of system or organization allows for the de-centralization of jobs.� Formal procedures are de-emphasized.

Modular Organization

Modularity in organization changes the traditional hierarchical structure to form loosely coupled networks of organizational actors. The underlying idea is that these loosely coupled actors or objects would quite easily form and reform organizational components that are loosely coupled.

The idea of modularity in organizational structure goes hand in hand with idea of modularity in software development.� One of the software engineering goals for software design is that we should design software applications in a highly modular fashion.� Computing applications should be made of components that are highly modular.� That is each components should do one thing and one thing only.� For example in a Human Resource Management application a component may be responsible for creating Wage Slips.� This is a tangible and of value business process and outcome.� The same component should not also manage employee schedule.� It should be modular. �Furthermore, software components should be loosely coupled. That is if we change the internal structure or implementation of one of the components, this does not adversely affect the performance or functionality of other components that it interacts with.� In other words these components should be loosely coupled.� In building systems we endeavor to build solutions made up of components that are highly modular and loosely coupled.

These are organizations where non-core functions are likely to be sub-contracted or outsourced.� This is a direct effect of the use of technology and telecommunication channels for doing business.� Using affordable technology and connectivity, companies can maintain relationships with business partners at lower costs than ever before.� This also has an impact on the product in that such organizations tend to build products or services that are highly modular.� These organizations concentrate on their core capabilities and build alliances and joint ventures.�

In summary

Other Aspects of Organizational Structure - A note on centralization v decentralization

Characteristics of Decentralized Structures

  • Features of High Decentralization (Flatter Organizations)
  • Eliminates layers of management
    • Decisions can be made by people closer to the problem
  • Faster decision-making without resort to higher level consultation
    • Excellent training experience for promotion to higher level management
    • Decisions better adapted to local conditions
  • Features of Low Decentralization (Taller Organizations)
  • Eliminates additional responsibility not desired by some people performing routine jobs
    • Permits crucial decisions to be made by individuals with the big picture
  • Closer control of operations
    • Uniformity of policies, practices, and procedures
  • Better use of centralized, specialized experts

Some emerging trends are significant

  • Increasing pace of technology change and development
  • Increasing impact of technology on organizational structures
  • Employees and Customers technology/computer literate

�        Business areas/functions are increasingly accountable for the value they create for the customer.

�        Business boundaries are blurring as electronic networks tie business partners, suppliers and customers more closely together.

�        Activities are becoming more distributed, business wide (and sometimes worldwide).

�        The size and importance of premises such as centralized business headquarters is decreasing.

Acknowledgements

Classifications and some diagrams in this document are derived from:

Montana, P. and Charnov, B. Management: A Streamlined Course for Students and Business People. (Hauppauge, New York: Barron�s Business Review Series, 1993), pp. 155-169.

What divides an organization into smaller units?

In a functional structure, a common configuration, an organization is divided into smaller groups by areas of specialty (such as IT, finance, operations, and marketing). Some refer to these functional areas as " silos "—entities that are vertical and disconnected from each other.

What is dividing tasks into smaller jobs called?

specialization. dividing tasks into smaller jobs. departmentalization. The process of setting up individual departments to do specialized tasks.

What is the process departmentalization?

Process departmentalization groups people by where in the production process their work usually occurs. For example, a toy company may have a department for ordering the raw materials, one for building toys and a third department for transporting them. Process departmentalization is common among production companies.

When the work is subdivided into departments it is called?

Departmentalization. Once jobs are divided up through work specialization, those jobs need to be combined together to coordinate common tasks. Departmentalization is the basis by which jobs are grouped together.