What are the important characteristics of sibling relationships?

Sibling relationships constitute one of the main subsystems within the family context. They play a significant role in children’s social and psychological functioning. The study of sibling relationships has drawn the attention of researchers in the last two decades. The purpose of the present chapter is to discuss various aspects of sibling relationships and to analyze the influence of these relationships on children’s well-being. Two specific topics are addressed. First, we discuss research evidence on the characteristics of siblings, the specific dimensions associated with the quality of their relationships, and their influence on children’s positive social outcomes. Second, we analyze central issues related to the formulation of public policies to foster children’s well-being in sibling relationships. More specifically, we discuss the links between research and intervention programs on sibling relationships, and their connection with policies on children’s well-being. In the last section of the chapter, we discuss some of the main challenges for research, interventions, and public policies with regard to sibling relationships.

Keywords

  • Birth Order
  • Child Relationship
  • Young Sibling
  • Marital Conflict
  • Sibling Relationship

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter

EUR   29.95

Price includes VAT (Singapore)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_150
  • Chapter length: 26 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Chapter

eBookEUR   1,711.99Price includes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-90-481-9063-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy eBook

Hardcover BookEUR   1,999.99Price excludes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-90-481-9062-1
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Hardcover Book

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguado Quintero, L. F., & García González, C. A. (2008). Monitoreando el bienestar de la niñez en Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, XVI, 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J. (2010). Child well-being, child development and family life. In M. Colette & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 21–38). Philadelphia: Kinsgley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R. (1989). Family processes and the competence of adolescents and primary school children. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 430–444. doi:10.1007/BF02139245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. R. (1999). Sibling, half-sibling, and stepsibling relationships in remarried families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 101–126. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. R., & Rice, A. M. (1992). Sibling relationships during remarriage. In E. M. Hetherington & W. G. Clingempeel. (Eds.), Coping with marital transitions: A family systems perspective. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development 57(227), 1–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmitia, M., & Hessor, J. (1993). Why siblings are important agents of cognitive development: A comparison of siblings and peers. Child Development, 64, 430–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, L., Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. B. (1996). Negative sibling interactions as predictors of later adjustment problems in adolescent and young adult males. In G. H. Brody (Ed.), Sibling relationships: Their causes and consequences (pp. 197–229). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2002). Evaluating outcomes and programs versus monitoring well-being: A child-centered perspective. In T. Vecchiatoi, A. N. Maluccio, & C. Canali (Eds.), Evaluating child and families services: Comparative client and program perspectives. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2010). Developing indicators for child well-being in a changing context. In M. Colette & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 129–142). Philadelphia: Kinsgley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & George, R. (Eds.) (2006). Indicators of children’s well-being: Understanding their role, usage and policy influence. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, H. A., Andrews, B. A., George, R., Lee, B. J., & Aber, L. J. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K. (2006). Family policy matters: How policymaking affect families and what professionals can do. Mahwah: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidenced-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K., Olson, J. R., Linney, K. D., & Mills, J. (2000). Connecting research and policy making: Implications for theory and practice from the Family Impact Seminars. Family Relations, 49, 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., Davidson, L., Keyes, C. L. M., Moore, K. A., & The Center for Child Well-Being. (2003). Well-being: Positive development across the life course. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Rees, G., Keung, A., & Goswami, H. (2010). The subjective well-being of children. In M. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 181–204). Philadelphia: Kinsgley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H. (1998). Sibling relationship quality: Its causes and consequences. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H. (2004). Siblings' direct and indirect contributions to child development. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 13, 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Kim, S., Murry, V. M., & Brown, A. C. (2003). Longitudinal direct and indirect pathways linking older sibling competence to the development of younger sibling competence. Developmental Psychology, 39, 618–628. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., MacKinnon, C. E., & MacKinnon, R. (1985). Role of relationships and behavior between preschool-aged and school-aged sibling pairs. Developmental Psychology, 21, 124–129. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.1.124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. M., Hanafin, S., & Langford, S. (2010). National reporting on child well-being: The State of the Nations’ Children reports in the Republic of Ireland. In M. Colette & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 143–160). Philadelphia: Kinsgley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, D. (1992). The developmental courses of sibling and peer relationships. In F. Boer & J. Dunn (Eds.), Children's sibling relationships: Developmental and clinical issues (pp. 19–40). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro Solano, A. (2009). El bienestar psicológico: Cuatro décadas de progreso. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 63, 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicirelli, V. G. (1994). Sibling relationships in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicirelli, V. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicirelli, V. G. (1996). Sibling relationships in middle and old age. Advances in applied developmental psychology. In G. H. Brody (Ed.), Sibling relationships: Their causes and consequences (pp. 47–73). Westport: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, K., & Conger, R. (1994). Differential parenting and change in sibling differences in delinquency. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 287–302. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.8.3.287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, K. J., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1994). Sibling relations during hard times. In R. D. Conger, G. H. Elder, F. Lorenz, R. Simons, & L. Whitbeck (Eds.), Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America, social institutions and social change (pp. 235–252). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, K. J., & Kramer, L. (2010). Introduction to the special section: Perspectives on sibling relationships: Advancing child development research. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (1996). Sibling relationships. In R. L. Simons (Ed.), Understanding differences between divorced and intact families: Stress, interaction, and child outcome (pp. 104–121). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, K. C., Bryant, C., & Brennom, J. (2004). The changing nature of adolescent sibling relationships: A theoretical framework for evaluating the role of relationship quality. In R. D. Conger, F. Lorenz, & K. A. S. Wickrama (Eds.), Continuity and change in family relations: Theory, methods and empirical findings (pp. 319–344). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, K. C., Williams, S. T., Little, W. M., Masyn, K. E., & Shebloski, B. (2009). Development of mastery during adolescence: The role of family problem solving. Journal of Social Health and Behavior, 50, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., Rosenberg, M. L., & Moore, K. A. (2003). Well-being and the future: Using science based knowledge to inform practice and policy. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-Being (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 525–542). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60, 746–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, T., & Jiménez, R. E. (2007). Aproximación a la teoría del bienestar. Scientia et Technica, 37, 395–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (1996). The role of parents and older siblings in predicting adolescent substance use: Modeling development via structural equation latent growth methodology. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 158–172. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.2.158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1983). Sibling relationships in early childhood. Child Development, 54, 571–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1988). Connections between relationships: Implications of research on mothers and siblings. In R. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp. 168–180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2000). State of the art: Siblings. The Psychologist, 13, 244–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2006). Siblings and socialization. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 309–327). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2007). Siblings and socialization. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hasting (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 309–327). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Dale, N. (1984). I am daddy: 2-year olds’ collaboration in joint pretend with sibling and mother. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 131–158). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1986). Siblings and the development of prosocial behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1991). Why are siblings so different? The significance of differences in sibling experiences within the family. Family Process, 30, 271–283. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00271.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., Slomkowski, C., & Beardsall, L. (1994). Sibling relationships from the preschool period through middle childhood and early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 30, 315–324. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.315.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, P. L. (1998). Impact of adolescent childbearing on families and younger siblings: Effects that increase younger siblings’ risk for early pregnancy. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 62–74. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0202_1.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, P. L., & Rook, K. S. (1992). Compensatory patterns of support among children’s peer relationships: A test using school friends, nonschool friends, and siblings. Developmental Psychology, 28, 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espada, J. P., Pereira, J. R., & García-Fernández, J. M. (2008). Influencia de los modelos sociales en el consumo de alcohol de los adolescentes [Influence of social models on adolescents’ alcohol consumption]. Piscothema, 20(4), 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facio, A., & Resett, S. (2007). Desarrollo de las relaciones con padres y hermanos en adolescentes argentinos [Development of parent-child and sibling relationships in Argentinean adolescents]. Apuntes de Psicología, 25(3), 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., & Hetherington, E. M. (2001). Differential parenting as a within-family variable. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 22–37. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.1.22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships. Child Development, 56, 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (2004). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, C. C., Crnic, K., Lameberty, G., Wasik, B. H., Jenkins, R., Garcia, H. V., et al. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E. B., & Yaggi, K. E. (2000). Destructive sibling conflict and the development of conduct problems in young boys. Developmental Psychology, 36, 44–53. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, K., Jenkins, J., & Dunn, J. (2007). Are sibling relationships protective? A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S., Grusec, J. E., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). Confidence in protection: Arguments for a narrow definition of attachment. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 475–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, O. (2007). Policy looking research. In J. L. Aber, A. J. Bishop-Josef, A. M. Jones, K. T. McLearn, & D. A. Phillips (Eds.), Child development and social policy: Knowledge for action (pp. 29–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruendel, J., & Aber, J. L. (2007). Bridging the gap between research and child policy change: The role of strategic communications in policy. In J. L. Aber, A. J. Bishop-Josef, A. M. Jones, K. T. McLearn, & D. A. Phillips (Eds.), Child development and social policy: Knowledge for action (pp. 43–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, K. V., & Laszloffy, T. A. (1995). The cultural genogram: A key to training culturally competent family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold, G. T., Osborne, L. N., & Conger, R. D. (1997). Mom and dad are at it again: Adolescent perceptions of marital conflict and adolescent psychological distress. Developmental Psychology, 33, 333–350. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.2.333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M., Brown, B. V., & Prosser, W. R. (1997). Indicators of children’s well-being. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C., & Dunn, J. (1997). Early experiences with family conflict: Implications for arguments with a close friend. Developmental Psychology, 33, 869–881. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.5.869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M. (1989). Coping with family transitions: Winners, losers and survivors. Child Development, 60, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M. (1999). Family functioning and the adjustment of adolescent siblings in diverse types of families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., & Clingempeel, W. G. (1992). Coping with marital transitions: A family systems approach. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., Aquan-Assee, J., Bukowski, W. M., Lehoux, P. M., & Rinaldi, C. M. (2001). Siblings as confidants: Emotional understanding, relationship warmth, and sibling self-disclosure. Social Development, 10, 439–454. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. (2005). Connecting the science of child development to public policy. Social Policy Reports, 19(4), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (1992). Sibling relationships in disharmonious homes: Potential difficulties and protective effects. In F. Boer & J. Dunn (Eds.), Children’s sibling relationships: Developmental and clinical issues (pp. 125–138). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J., & Smith, M. (1990). Factors protecting children living in disharmonious homes: Maternal reports. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J., Simpson, A., Dunn, J., Rasbash, J., & O’Connor, T. G. (2005). Mutual influence of marital conflict and children’s behavior problems: Shared and nonshared family risks. Child Development, 76, 24–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00827.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). The dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287. doi:10.1177/0146167296223006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D., & Kramer, L. (2008). Improving emotion regulation and sibling relationship quality: The more fun with sisters and brothers program. Family Relations, 57, 567–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. E., Hetherington, E. M., & Reiss, D. (1999). Associations among family relationships, antisocial peers, and adolescents’ externalizing behaviors: Gender and family type differences. Child Development, 70, 1209–1230. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, A., Kramer, L., Krull, J. L., & Crick, N. R. (2002). Children’s perceptions of the fairness of parental preferential treatment and their socioemotional well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 297–306. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.3.297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L. (2004). Experimental interventions in sibling relations. In R. D. Conger, F. O. Lorenz, & K. A. S. Wickrama (Eds.), Continuity and change in family relations: Theory, methods and empirical findings (pp. 345–380). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L. (2010). The essential ingredients of successful sibling relationships: An emerging framework for advancing theory and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 80–86. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00122.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L., & Bank, L. (2005). Sibling relationship contributions to individual and family well-being: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 483–485. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.4.483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L., & Baron, L. A. (1995). Parental perceptions of children’s sibling relationships. Family Relations, 44, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L., & Gottman, J. M. (1992). Becoming a sibling: “With a little help from my friends”. Developmental Psychology, 28, 685–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L., & Radey, C. (1997). Improving sibling relationships among young children: A social skills training model. Family Relations, 4(3), 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L., & Kowal, A. K. (2005). Sibling relationship quality from birth to adolescence: The enduring contributions of friends. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 503–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, T., & Pike, A. (2010). Associations between adolescent siblings’ relationship quality and similarity and differences in values. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 411–418. doi:10.1037/a0020060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Bornstein, M. H., & Smith, C. (2003). Child well-being: From elements to integrations. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-Being (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 501–523). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. L., & Ross, H. S. (1995). The development of aggression within sibling conflict. Early Education and Development, 6, 335–358. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed0604_4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, A. E. (2002). Cultural teaching: The development of teaching skills in Maya sibling interactions. Child Development, 73, 969–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, M., & Rose, W. (2010). Child well-being: Current issues and future directions. In M. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 207–218). Philadelphia: Kinsgley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, J. K., Brody, G. H., & Stoneman, Z. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of sibling relationships as mediators of the link between family processes and youths’ best friendships. Family Relations, 43, 400–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S., & Shanahan, L. (2010). Sibling experiences in diverse family contexts. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S. M., Whiteman, S. D., Kim, J., & Crouter, A. C. (2007). Characteristics and correlates of sibling relationships in two-parent African American families. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesky, A., & Levitt, M. (2005). Sibling support in early adolescence: Buffering and compensation across relationships. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(3), 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, A. (2004). Perceived parental marital satisfaction and divorce: Effects on sibling relations in emerging adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 41, 115–128. doi:10.1300/J087v41n01_07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, P. (1988). Relationships within the family: A systems perspective on development. In R. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., & Keyes, C. L. (2003). A brief history of well-being in children and adults. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-Being (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 1–11). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noller, P. (2005). Sibling relationships in adolescence: Learning and growing together. Personal Relationships, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00099.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2011). Compendium of OECD well-being indicators. Retrieved on 20 Jan 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/document/28/0,3746,en_2649_201185_47916764_1_1_1_1,00.html

  • Pecora, P. J., & Harrison-Jackson, M. (2010). The challenge of improving children’s well-being and measuring outcomes: An American perspective. In M. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 161–179). Philadelphia: Kinsgley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228–1238. doi:10.2307/1131316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, J. S. (1986). The structure of 5-year-olds’ verbal quarrels with peers and siblings. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 147, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. L., & Rosenberg, M. L. (2003). The strength-based approach to child well-being: Let’s begin with the end in mind. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-Being (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 13–21). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortman, A., & Voorpostel, M. (2009). Parental divorce and sibling relationships: A research note. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 74–91. doi:10.1177/0192513X08322782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, A., & Ross, H. S. (2001). Problem-solving, contention, and struggle: How siblings resolve a conflict of interests. Child Development, 72, 1710–1722. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recchia, H. E., & Howe, N. (2009). Sibling relationship quality moderates the associations between parental interventions and siblings’ independent conflict strategies and outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 551–561. doi:10.1037/a0014980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, M. K., & Stocker, C. M. (2006). Associations between family cohesion and adolescent siblings’ externalizing behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 663–669. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll, K., Carrillo, S., & Castro, J. A. (2009). Relationship between siblings and psychological adjustment in adolescents: Effects of the quality of parent-child relationship. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 27(1), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., Ross, M., Stein, N., & Trabasso, T. (2006). How siblings resolve their conflicts: The importance of first offers, planning, and limited opposition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 124–126. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00289.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, R. (2004). Sibling relationships: Theory and issues for practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, G., & Noller, P. (2002). Adolescent’s perceptions of differential parenting: Links with attachment style and adolescent adjustment. Personal Relationships, 9, 173–190. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, G., Darlington, Y., Noller, P., & Feeney, J. (2004). Children’s perceptions of their sibling relationships during parental separation and divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 41, 69–94. doi:10.1300/J087v41n01_05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skopp, N. A., McDonald, R., Manke, B., & Jouriles, E. N. (2005). Siblings in domestically violent families: Experiences of interparent conflict and adjustment problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 324–333. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C. M. (1994). Children’s perceptions of relationships with siblings, friends, and mothers: Compensatory processes and links with adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1447–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C. M., & McHale, S. M. (1992). The nature and family correlates of preadolescents’ perceptions of their sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 179–195. doi:10.1177/0265407592092002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C. M., & Youngblade, L. (1999). Marital conflict and parental hostility: Links with children’s sibling and peer relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 598–609. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.4.598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C., Ahmed, K., & Stall, M. (1997). Marital satisfaction and maternal emotional expressiveness: Links with children’s sibling relationships. Social Development, 6, 373–385. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00112.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C. M., Burwell, R. A., & Briggs, M. L. (2002). Sibling conflict in middle childhood predicts children’s adjustment in early adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 50–57. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stormshak, E. A., Bullock, B. M., & Falkenstein, C. A. (2009). Harnessing the power of sibling relationships as a tool for optimizing social-emotional development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 126, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J., Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1999). Older siblings as socializers of younger siblings’ empathy. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 176–198. doi:10.1177/0272431699019002003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., Whiteman, S. D., Thayer, S. M., & Delgado, M. Y. (2005). Adolescent sibling relationships in Mexican American families: Exploring the role of familism. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 512–522. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.4.512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vielma Rangel, J., & Alonso, L. (2010). El estudio del bienestar psicológico. Una breve revisión teórica. Educere, 14, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt Yuan, A. S. (2009). Sibling relationships and adolescents’ mental health: The interrelationship of structure and quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1221–1244. doi:10.1177/0192513X09334906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volling, B. (2003). Sibling relationships. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-Being (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 205–220). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volling, B. L., & Belsky, J. (1992). The contribution of mother-child and father-child relationships to the quality of sibling interaction: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 63, 1209–1222. doi:10.2307/1131528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. E., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (2003). The sibling relationship in young adulthood: sibling functions and relationship perceptions as influenced by sibling pair composition. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 245–263. doi:10.1177/0192513X02250098.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2001). Sibling relationships over the life course: A panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaff, J. F., Smith, D. C., Rogers, M. F., Leavitt, C. H., Halle, T. G., & Bornstein, M. H. (2003). Holistic well-being and the developing child. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-Being (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 23–32). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukow-Goldring, P. (2002). Sibling caregiving. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Status and social conditions of parenting, Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukow-Goldring, P. (2005). Sibling caregiving: Being and becoming and giving and getting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 4. Status and social conditions of parenting (pp. 177–208). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 E # 18 A – 12, Bogotá, Colombia

    K. Ripoll-Núñez & Prof. Sonia Carrillo

Authors

  1. K. Ripoll-Núñez

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Sonia Carrillo

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ripoll-Núñez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Asher Ben-Arieh

  2. Research Institute of Quality of Life, University of Girona, Girona, Spain

    Ferran Casas

  3. Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Ivar Frønes

  4. Department of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Jill E. Korbin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ripoll-Núñez, K., Carrillo, S. (2014). Sibling Relationships and Children’s Social Well-Being. In: Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., Korbin, J. (eds) Handbook of Child Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_150

What are the important characteristics of sibling relationships quizlet?

Judy Dunn, one of the most prominent researchers of sibling relationships, argues that the three most important characteristics of sibling relationships are 1)the emotional quality of the relationship, 2) familiarity and intimacy of the relationship and 3) ...

What is important about sibling relationships?

There is evidence to suggest that healthy sibling relationships promote empathy, prosocial behavior and academic achievement. While healthy sibling relationships can be an incredible source of support, unhealthy and toxic sibling relationships may be equally devastating and destabilizing.

What are the characteristics of a good sibling?

If you want to be a good sibling, here are some admirable qualities that you must possess:.
Supportive of their siblings. ... .
Attentive listener. ... .
Always available to help. ... .
Ever thoughtful. ... .
Can be trusted. ... .
Stands up for their siblings. ... .
Frank and honest with them. ... .
Corrects their mistakes..

Why siblings have some common characteristics?

Half our genes are from our mother and half of them are from our father. If there are any siblings, your brothers and sisters also inherited 23 chromosomes from each parent. On average, children with the same biological parents share about 50 percent of their genes with each of their brothers and sisters.