What is a dual purpose test audit?

First, tests of controls are not required by the risk assessment standards of 2006, or the redrafts of those standards effective for periods ending after December 15, 2012.  Sufficient substantive evidence can be obtained from other risk assessment procedures, analytical procedures and tests of balances to express an opinion on financial statements.

Tests of controls may be necessary, however, when:

•    The auditor plans reliance on the results of the tests for a low assessed level of control risk.
•    Tests of balances and analytical procedures are not sufficient to evaluate certain financial statement assertions (such as completeness for revenues).
•    Inquiries and observations concerning key controls in smaller entities are necessary to offset significant control deficiencies and material weaknesses for a control risk assessment at some level less than high.

When tests of controls are performed, they may be used to evaluate some or all of the assertions for classes of transactions events thereby reducing related tests of balances.  Common sample sizes used in practice are 40 sample units (assuming no errors or deviations) or 60 sample units (permitting one error or deviation).

Tests of controls are usually “dual purpose.” One purpose is to test compliance with an entity’s designed internal controls, formal or informal.  The second purpose is to “re-perform” certain accounting system and internal control procedures.  Descriptions of the dual purposes of tests of controls follow.

Tests of Controls—Compliance Transactions Tests (author’s words):

Compliance tests are designed as tests of internal control procedures or activities to determine:

•    The frequency with which the control procedures are performed.
•    The quality of the performance of the control procedures.
•    The person performing the procedures.
•    The design effectiveness of the procedures.

Compliance tests of controls are performed to measure the likelihood of errors occurring and going undetected and to reduce the amount of substantive testing.  Compliance procedures consist mainly of observations, inspections and inquiries. Documented evidence of the internal control procedures performed by a client is necessary to evaluate compliance for larger clients with effectively designed internal controls.  Examining a foreperson’s approval of hours worked on employees’ time cards, for example, is a compliance test of control.  Materiality is measured by the frequency of errors.

Owners or managers of smaller entities may perform key controls that are not documented.  In these circumstances, the auditor may assess compliance by making inquiries of an owner or manager and inspecting relevant documentation, and evaluating the owner’s or manager’s responses. Documentation of the owner’s or manager’s compliance should be included in a memo or on a working paper.

Tests of Controls—Substantive Transactions Tests (author’s words):

A substantive transactions test is a test of the accounting system and is normally designed to test for monetary errors.  Determining that all entries recorded in the cash disbursements journal are valid by examining supporting documents, or that the extension of sales prices and units on sales invoices are correct, are examples of substantive transactions testing procedures.  

Tests of controls are often used as “dual-purpose” tests, i.e., both compliance and substantive tests of transactions are performed.  While both may supply sufficient evidence to verify applicable financial statement assertions, we can often be more efficient by performing one or the other.  Only a “handful” (10%-20%) of the selected transactions need be tested substantively if we choose compliance tests.  If a client has limited internal controls, but has a good accounting system on the other hand, we may perform only substantive transactions tests.  For smaller entities, informal substantive transactions tests may be informally performed as systems walk-through procedures.

More resources concerning tests of controls and audit strategies can be obtained from my live and on-demand webcasts by clicking of the applicable box on the left side of my home page, www.cpafirmsupport.com.

Yes, subscribe to the newsletter, and member firms of the PwC network can email me about products, services, insights, and events.

Terms of Compliance*

By providing your details and checking the box, you acknowledge you have read the Privacy Statement and Terms and Conditions (including the sections in each related to Registered Users).*

Required field

What is a dual purpose test audit?
The following fields are not editable on this screen: First Name, Last Name, Company, and Country or Region. Please reach out to [email protected] if you need any assistance modifying these fields.

What are the two types of audit tests?

These are the five types of testing methods used during audits..
Inquiry..
Observation..
Examination or Inspection of Evidence..
Re-performance..
Computer Assisted Audit Technique (CAAT).

What is dual direction testing and how is dual direction testing used in an audit?

The Selection of samples to obtain the evidence in one direction about control over completeness and in other direction control over the occurrence determines the completeness and occurrence of all transactions recorded as dual-direction testing.

What are the five types of tests auditors use?

Auditors use one or more of five different test methods, including inquiry, observation, examination, re-performance, and computer-assisted audit techniques (CAAT), which involves testing large volumes of data using computer algorithms.

What does audit of a test mean?

What is an Audit Test? An audit test is a sample taken from a larger population, with the intent of testing the sample for certain characteristics, which are then extrapolated to the entire population.