A female client with a suspected brain tumor is scheduled for computed tomography

1. Esses D, Birnbaum A, Bijur P, Shah S, Gleyzer A, Gallagher EJ. Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22:270–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Mettler FA, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Lipoti JA, McCrohan J, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys. 2008;95:502–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW, McCollough CH, Mettler FA, Pearce MS, Suleiman OH, et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011;258:889–905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008;249:97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V. Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1391–1396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Rosen MP, Siewert B, Sands DZ, Bromberg R, Edlow J, Raptopoulos V. Value of abdominal CT in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:418–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012;307:2400–2409. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. IMV 2006 CT Market Summary Report. Des Plains, IL: IMV Medical Information Division, 2006. [Google Scholar]

9. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Einstein AJ, Nallamothu BK. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:849–857. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan JL, Stabin MG, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot. 2000;20:353–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Schauer DA, Linton OW. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements report shows substantial medical exposure increase. Radiology. 2009;253:293–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Tsapaki V, Ahmed NA, AlSuwaidi JS, Beganovic A, Benider A, BenOmrane L, Borisova R, Economides S, El-Nachef L, Faj D, et al. Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:559–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Thomadsen BR, Gilley DB, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan J, Yoshizumi TT. Nuclear medicine exposure in the United States, 2005-2007: preliminary results. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:384–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Heiken JP, Peterson CM, Menias CO. Virtual colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: current status. Cancer Imaging. 2005;5 Spec No A:S133–S139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Smith JP, Miettinen OS. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1763–1771. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Dempster B. National rationing of MRI in Australia has impact on use of CT. BMJ. 2013;346:f3929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Freudenberg LS, Beyer T. Subjective perception of radiation risk. J Nucl Med. 2011;52 Suppl 2:29S–35S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Royal HD. Effects of low level radiation-what’s new? Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:392–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiations: Time for Reassessment? Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 1998. [Google Scholar]

21. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C, Howe G, Kaldor J, Muirhead CR, Schubauer-Berigan M, et al. The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007;167:396–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed Tomography - An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2071–2077. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Hatch M, Ron E, Bouville A, Zablotska L, Howe G. The Chernobyl disaster: cancer following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:56–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, Mabuchi K, Kodama K. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168:1–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Tubiana M. Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:317–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Hendee WR, O’Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology. 2012;264:312–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology. 2009;251:13–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Scott BR. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008;27:163–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Calabrese EJ. Muller’s Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science? Arch Toxicol. 2011;85:1495–1498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Doss M. Linear no-threshold model may not be appropriate for estimating cancer risk from CT. Radiology. 2014;270:307–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Kliewer E, Wajda A. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Cancer. 2001;91:854–862. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Desmond AN, O’Regan K, Curran C, McWilliams S, Fitzgerald T, Maher MM, Shanahan F. Crohn’s disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut. 2008;57:1524–1529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Kinsella SM, Coyle JP, Long EB, McWilliams SR, Maher MM, Clarkson MR, Eustace JA. Maintenance hemodialysis patients have high cumulative radiation exposure. Kidney Int. 2010;78:789–793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Kim PK, Gracias VH, Maidment AD, O’Shea M, Reilly PM, Schwab CW. Cumulative radiation dose caused by radiologic studies in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2004;57:510–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Noshchenko AG, Bondar OY, Drozdova VD. Radiation-induced leukemia among children aged 0-5 years at the time of the Chernobyl accident. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:412–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Ron E, Modan B, Boice JD, Alfandary E, Stovall M, Chetrit A, Katz L. Tumors of the brain and nervous system after radiotherapy in childhood. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1033–1039. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Huda W, Atherton JV, Ware DE, Cumming WA. An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology. 1997;203:417–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, Litwiller AL. Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology. 1999;210:645–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13761–13766. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Huang WY, Muo CH, Lin CY, Jen YM, Yang MH, Lin JC, Sung FC, Kao CH. Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:2354–2360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

50. Hall EJ. Invited editorial: CT scanning; risk versus benefit. J Radiol Prot. 2000;20:347–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, Feigelson HS, Roblin D, Flynn MJ, Vanneman N, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167:700–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

52. Coren ME, Ng V, Rubens M, Rosenthal M, Bush A. The value of ultrafast computed tomography in the investigation of pediatric chest disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998;26:389–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

53. White KS. Invited article: helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective. Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26:5–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

54. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, Zane RD, Schiff GD, Hanson R, Baeyens PF, Khorasani R. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology. 2010;256:460–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Johnson AM, Dahn CM, Cadiz LA. Deficiencies in physician knowledge of the risks of imaging in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123 Suppl 1:58S. [Google Scholar]

56. Ratnapalan S, Bona N, Chandra K, Koren G. Physicians’ perceptions of teratogenic risk associated with radiography and CT during early pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1107–1109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Brent RL. The effect of embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound: counseling the pregnant and nonpregnant patient about these risks. Semin Oncol. 1989;16:347–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Yamazaki JN, Schull WJ. Perinatal loss and neurological abnormalities among children of the atomic bomb. Nagasaki and Hiroshima revisited, 1949 to 1989. JAMA. 1990;264:605–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Schull WJ, Otake M. Cognitive function and prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation. Teratology. 1999;59:222–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

60. Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:333–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Miller DL, Damilakis J, Dixon RG, Marx MV, Schueler BA, Vañó E, Venkatesan A, Bartal G, et al. Radiation management for interventions using fluoroscopic or computed tomographic guidance during pregnancy: a joint guideline of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe with Endorsement by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:19–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, Lockwood CJ, Boiselle PM, Hurwitz LM, James AH, McCullough LB, Menda Y, Paidas MJ, et al. American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline--Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy. Radiology. 2012;262:635–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

63. Ames Castro M, Shipp TD, Castro EE, Ouzounian J, Rao P. The use of helical computed tomography in pregnancy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:954–957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

64. Wagner LK, Huda W. When a pregnant woman with suspected appendicitis is referred for a CT scan, what should a radiologist do to minimize potential radiation risks? Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34:589–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. Sternberg S. CT scans in children linked to cancer later. USA Today. 2001. [Google Scholar]

67. Schenkman L. Radiology. Second thoughts about CT imaging. Science. 2011;331:1002–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

69. Baumann BM, Chen EH, Mills AM, Glaspey L, Thompson NM, Jones MK, Farner MC. Patient perceptions of computed tomographic imaging and their understanding of radiation risk and exposure. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:1–7.e2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

70. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231:393–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

71. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

72. Frush DP. Responsible use of CT. Radiology. 2003;229:289–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

73. Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP, Fenton LZ. Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: it’s OK to tell them. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:271–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

74. Gunderman RB, Applegate KE. Managing risk: threat or opportunity? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:43–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

75. Earnest F, Swensen SJ, Zink FE. Respecting patient autonomy: screening at CT and informed consent. Radiology. 2003;226:633–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

76. Linton OW, Mettler FA. National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:321–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

77. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004;230:619–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

78. Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:725–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

79. Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland RB, Lewis MH, Gower-Thomas K. Doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ. 2003;327:371–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

80. Krille L, Hammer GP, Merzenich H, Zeeb H. Systematic review on physician’s knowledge about radiation doses and radiation risks of computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:36–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

81. Rice HE, Frush DP, Harker MJ, Farmer D, Waldhausen JH. Peer assessment of pediatric surgeons for potential risks of radiation exposure from computed tomography scans. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1157–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

82. Arslanoğlu A, Bilgin S, Kubal Z, Ceyhan MN, Ilhan MN, Maral I. Doctors’ and intern doctors’ knowledge about patients’ ionizing radiation exposure doses during common radiological examinations. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13:53–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

83. Keijzers GB, Britton CJ. Doctors’ knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2010;193:450–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

84. Scatarige JC, Diette GB, Haponik EF, Merriman B, Fishman EK. Availability, requesting practices, and barriers to referral for high-resolution CT of the lungs: results of a survey of U.S. pulmonologists. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1370–1377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

85. Subramaniam R, Hall T, Chou T, Sheehan D. Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2005;118:U1699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

86. O’Sullivan J, O’Connor OJ, O’Regan K, Clarke B, Burgoyne LN, Ryan MF, Maher MM. An assessment of medical students’ awareness of radiation exposures associated with diagnostic imaging investigations. Insights Imaging. 2010;1:86–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

87. Sadigh G, Khan R, Kassin MT, Applegate KE. Radiation safety knowledge and perceptions among residents: a potential improvement opportunity for graduate medical education in the United States. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:869–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

88. McCollough CH. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce. Health Phys. 2008;95:508–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

89. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de González A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–2086. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

90. Durán A, Hian SK, Miller DL, Le Heron J, Padovani R, Vano E. A summary of recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:562–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

91. Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, Balter S, Dixon R, Padovani R, Schueler B, Cardella JF, de Baère T. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:230–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

92. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47:27–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

93. Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:285–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

94. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26:503–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

95. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, Laor T, Gylys-Morin VM, Anton CG, Thomas SR, Frush DP. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children’s Hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:303–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

96. Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL. Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology. 2003;228:352–360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

97. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Suess C, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081–1086. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

98. Brisse HJ, Robilliard M, Savignoni A, Pierrat N, Gaboriaud G, De Rycke Y, Neuenschwander S, Aubert B, Rosenwald JC. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control. Health Phys. 2009;97:303–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

99. Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010;37:234–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

100. Flohr TG, Leng S, Yu L, Aiimendinger T, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Eusemann CD, Stierstorfer K, Schmidt B, McCollough CH. Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality. Med Phys. 2009;36:5641–5653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

101. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:191–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

102. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, Pien H, Hsieh J, Blake MA, Sahani DV. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:202–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

103. Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys. 2007;34:4526–4544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

104. Mendrik AM, Vonken EJ, Rutten A, Viergever MA, van Ginneken B. Noise reduction in computed tomography scans using 3-d anisotropic hybrid diffusion with continuous switch. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1585–1594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

105. Paul NS, Blobel J, Prezelj E, Burey P, Ursani A, Menezes RJ, Kashani H, Siewerdsen JH. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1363–1380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

106. O’Connor OJ, Vandeleur M, McGarrigle AM, Moore N, McWilliams SR, McSweeney SE, O’Neill M, Ni Chroinin M, Maher MM. Development of low-dose protocols for thin-section CT assessment of cystic fibrosis in pediatric patients. Radiology. 2010;257:820–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

107. Huda W. Radiation doses and risks in chest computed tomography examinations. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4:316–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

108. Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, Kim S, Lee YJ, Kim KP, Lee HS, Ahn S, Kim T, Hwang SS, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1596–1605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

109. Kim SY, Lee KH, Kim K, Kim TY, Lee HS, Hwang SS, Song KJ, Kang HS, Kim YH, Rhee JE. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 2011;260:437–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

110. Hidajat N, Mäurer J, Schröder RJ, Wolf M, Vogl T, Felix R. Radiation exposure in spiral computed tomography. Dose distribution and dose reduction. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:51–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

111. Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35:213–225; quiz 226-228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

112. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Kamath RS, Halpern EF, Saini S. Radiation from “extra” images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation. Radiology. 2004;232:409–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

113. Kolditz D, Kyriakou Y, Kalender WA. Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose. Med Phys. 2010;37:2719–2730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

114. Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB, Dreyer KJ, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH. Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology. 2009;251:147–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

115. Rosenthal DI, Weilburg JB, Schultz T, Miller JC, Nixon V, Dreyer KJ, Thrall JH. Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:799–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

116. Caoili EM. Imaging of the urinary tract using multidetector computed tomography urography. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002;20:174–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

117. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology. 2004;232:126–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

118. Chow LC, Kwan SW, Olcott EW, Sommer G. Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:314–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

119. Hadley JL, Agola J, Wong P. Potential impact of the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria on CT for trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:937–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

120. Stein SC, Fabbri A, Servadei F, Glick HA. A critical comparison of clinical decision instruments for computed tomographic scanning in mild closed traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:180–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

121. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, Hoyle JD, Atabaki SM, Holubkov R, Nadel FM, Monroe D, Stanley RM, Borgialli DA, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009;374:1160–1170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

122. Slovis T, Berdon W. Panel Discussion. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:242–244. [Google Scholar]

123. Stephen AE, Segev DL, Ryan DP, Mullins ME, Kim SH, Schnitzer JJ, Doody DP. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:367–371; discsussion 367-371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

124. Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM, Valley M, Camargo CA. Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:780–783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

125. Broder JS. CT utilization: the emergency department perspective. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38 Suppl 4:S664–S669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

126. van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, van Heesewijk HP, van Ramshorst B, Ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1535–1545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

127. Lehnert BE, Bree RL. Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:192–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

128. Larson PA, Bettman MA, Waldrip C. Ionizing radiation in abdominal CT and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:298; author reply 298–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

129. Robinson JD, Hippe DS, Hiatt MD. The effect of a no-denial policy on imaging utilization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:501–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

130. Zondervan RL, Hahn PF, Sadow CA, Liu B, Lee SI. Body CT scanning in young adults: examination indications, patient outcomes, and risk of radiation-induced cancer. Radiology. 2013;267:460–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

131. Wall BF, Kendall GM, Edwards AA, Bouffler S, Muirhead CR, Meara JR. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation? Br J Radiol. 2006;79:285–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

132. ICRP Publication 105. Radiation protection in medicine. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

133. Ronckers CM, Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Land CE. Multiple diagnostic X-rays for spine deformities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:605–613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

134. Flint-Richter P, Sadetzki S. Genetic predisposition for the development of radiation-associated meningioma: an epidemiological study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:403–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

135. Jansen-van der Weide MC, Greuter MJ, Jansen L, Oosterwijk JC, Pijnappel RM, de Bock GH. Exposure to low-dose radiation and the risk of breast cancer among women with a familial or genetic predisposition: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2547–2556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

136. Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Einstein AJ. Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging. Radiology. 2011;261:193–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

137. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

138. Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Haylock RG, Phillipson MA, Willcock T, Berridge GL, Zhang W. Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:206–212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

139. Little MP, Boice JD. Comparison of breast cancer incidence in the Massachusetts tuberculosis fluoroscopy cohort and in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res. 1999;151:218–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

140. Brenner DJ. Does fractionation decrease the risk of breast cancer induced by low-LET radiation? Radiat Res. 1999;151:225–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

141. Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA. Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1194–1196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

142. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

143. Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC, Bulas D, Frush DP, Butler P, Morrison G, Callahan MJ, Applegate KE. Image gently: Ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:868–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

144. Applegate KE, Cost NG. Image Gently: a campaign to reduce children’s and adolescents’ risk for cancer during adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S93–S97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

145. Brink JA, Amis ES. Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology. 2010;257:601–602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

146. Sidhu M, Goske MJ, Connolly B, Racadio J, Yoshizumi TT, Strauss KJ, Coley BD, Utley T. Image Gently, Step Lightly: promoting radiation safety in pediatric interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W299–W301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

147. Sidhu M. Radiation safety in pediatric interventional radiology: Step Lightly. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:511–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

149. Caverly TJ, Prochazka AV, Cook-Shimanek M, Pawlak M, Stickrath C. Weighing the potential harms of computed tomography: patient survey. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:588–590; discussion 590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

150. Steele JR, Jones AK, Ninan EP. Quality initiatives: Establishing an interventional radiology patient radiation safety program. Radiographics. 2012;32:277–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

151. Miller DL, Balter S, Schueler BA, Wagner LK, Strauss KJ, Vañó E. Clinical radiation management for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2010;257:321–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

152. Miglioretti DL, Zhang Y, Johnson E, Lee C, Morin RL, Vanneman N, Smith-Bindman R. Personalized technologist dose audit feedback for reducing patient radiation exposure from CT. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11:300–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

153. Rodrigues JC, Negus IS, Manghat NE, Hamilton MC. A completed audit cycle of the lateral scan projection radiograph in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA); the impact on scan length and radiation dose. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:574–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

154. McCollough C, Branham T, Herlihy V, Bhargavan M, Robbins L, Bush K, McNitt-Gray M, Payne JT, Ruckdeschel T, Pfeiffer D, et al. Diagnostic reference levels from the ACR CT Accreditation Program. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:795–803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

155. Kim KP, Berrington de González A, Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Parker L, McHugh K, Craft AW, Lee C. Development of a database of organ doses for paediatric and young adult CT scans in the United Kingdom. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;150:415–426. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

156. Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:1390–1397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

157. Vassileva J, Rehani MM, Applegate K, Ahmed NA, Al-Dhuhli H, Al-Naemi HM, Al Suwaidi JS, Arandjic D, Beganovic A, Benavente T, et al. IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:623–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Can a CT scan without contrast detect a brain tumor?

This is usually done with injection of an x-ray contrast (dye), though CT scan done even without the x-ray contrast is also sufficient as the first imaging test. MRI with injection of contrast is a more definitive and detailed imaging test which can detect or rule out a brain tumor in most cases.

Can CT scan detect brain tumor?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans are used most often to look for brain diseases. These scans will almost always show a brain tumor, if one is present.

How accurate is CT scan for brain tumor?

See a doctor who can help However, CT scans are not the test of choice for looking for brain tumors. The are not very good at detecting smaller or more subtle tumors and in particularly they are not good at looking at the cerebellum, which is a part of the brain that sits low and in the back of the skull.

How would u know if u have a brain tumor?

Symptoms of a brain tumour seizures (fits) persistently feeling sick (nausea), being sick (vomiting) and drowsiness. mental or behavioural changes, such as memory problems or changes in personality. progressive weakness or paralysis on one side of the body.