Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?

Weakness ID: 327

Abstraction: Class
Structure: Simple

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Description

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Extended Description

The use of a non-standard algorithm is dangerous because a determined attacker may be able to break the algorithm and compromise whatever data has been protected. Well-known techniques may exist to break the algorithm.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Relationships

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Relevant to the view "Research Concepts" (CWE-1000)

NatureTypeIDName
ChildOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Pillar - a weakness that is the most abstract type of weakness and represents a theme for all class/base/variant weaknesses related to it. A Pillar is different from a Category as a Pillar is still technically a type of weakness that describes a mistake, while a Category represents a common characteristic used to group related things.
693 Protection Mechanism Failure
ParentOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
328 Use of Weak Hash
ParentOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Variant - a weakness that is linked to a certain type of product, typically involving a specific language or technology. More specific than a Base weakness. Variant level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 3 to 5 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
780 Use of RSA Algorithm without OAEP
ParentOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
ParentOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
1240 Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation
PeerOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Class - a weakness that is described in a very abstract fashion, typically independent of any specific language or technology. More specific than a Pillar Weakness, but more general than a Base Weakness. Class level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 1 or 2 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, and resource.
311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
PeerOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Variant - a weakness that is linked to a certain type of product, typically involving a specific language or technology. More specific than a Base weakness. Variant level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 3 to 5 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
301 Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol
CanFollow
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
208 Observable Timing Discrepancy

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Relevant to the view "Weaknesses for Simplified Mapping of Published Vulnerabilities" (CWE-1003)

NatureTypeIDName
ParentOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Relevant to the view "Architectural Concepts" (CWE-1008)

NatureTypeIDName
MemberOf
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Category - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic.
1013 Encrypt Data

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Background Details

Cryptographic algorithms are the methods by which data is scrambled. There are a small number of well-understood and heavily studied algorithms that should be used by most applications. It is quite difficult to produce a secure algorithm, and even high profile algorithms by accomplished cryptographic experts have been broken.

Since the state of cryptography advances so rapidly, it is common for an algorithm to be considered "unsafe" even if it was once thought to be strong. This can happen when new attacks against the algorithm are discovered, or if computing power increases so much that the cryptographic algorithm no longer provides the amount of protection that was originally thought.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Modes Of Introduction

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
The different Modes of Introduction provide information about how and when this weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which introduction may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the given phase.

PhaseNote
Architecture and Design COMMISSION: This weakness refers to an incorrect design related to an architectural security tactic.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Applicable Platforms

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
This listing shows possible areas for which the given weakness could appear. These may be for specific named Languages, Operating Systems, Architectures, Paradigms, Technologies, or a class of such platforms. The platform is listed along with how frequently the given weakness appears for that instance.

Languages

Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined Prevalence)

Technologies

Class: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined Prevalence)

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Common Consequences

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
This table specifies different individual consequences associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact.

ScopeImpactLikelihood
Confidentiality

Technical Impact: Read Application Data

The confidentiality of sensitive data may be compromised by the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm.

Integrity

Technical Impact: Modify Application Data

The integrity of sensitive data may be compromised by the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm.

Accountability
Non-Repudiation

Technical Impact: Hide Activities

If the cryptographic algorithm is used to ensure the identity of the source of the data (such as digital signatures), then a broken algorithm will compromise this scheme and the source of the data cannot be proven.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Likelihood Of Exploit

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Demonstrative Examples

Example 1

These code examples use the Data Encryption Standard (DES).

(bad code)

Example Language:

(bad code)

Example Language: Java 

Cipher des=Cipher.getInstance("DES...");
des.initEncrypt(key2);

(bad code)

Example Language: PHP 

function encryptPassword($password){

$iv_size = mcrypt_get_iv_size(MCRYPT_DES, MCRYPT_MODE_ECB);
$iv = mcrypt_create_iv($iv_size, MCRYPT_RAND);
$key = "This is a password encryption key";
$encryptedPassword = mcrypt_encrypt(MCRYPT_DES, $key, $password, MCRYPT_MODE_ECB, $iv);
return $encryptedPassword;

}

Once considered a strong algorithm, DES now regarded as insufficient for many applications. It has been replaced by Advanced Encryption Standard (AES).

Example 2

In 2022, the OT:ICEFALL study examined products by 10 different Operational Technology (OT) vendors. The researchers reported 56 vulnerabilities and said that the products were "insecure by design" [REF-1283]. If exploited, these vulnerabilities often allowed adversaries to change how the products operated, ranging from denial of service to changing the code that the products executed. Since these products were often used in industries such as power, electrical, water, and others, there could even be safety implications.

At least one OT product used weak hashes.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Observed Examples

ReferenceDescription

CVE-2022-30320

Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) uses a protocol with a cryptographically insecure hashing algorithm for passwords.

CVE-2008-3775

Product uses "ROT-25" to obfuscate the password in the registry.

CVE-2007-4150

product only uses "XOR" to obfuscate sensitive data

CVE-2007-5460

product only uses "XOR" and a fixed key to obfuscate sensitive data

CVE-2005-4860

Product substitutes characters with other characters in a fixed way, and also leaves certain input characters unchanged.

CVE-2002-2058

Attackers can infer private IP addresses by dividing each octet by the MD5 hash of '20'.

CVE-2008-3188

Product uses DES when MD5 has been specified in the configuration, resulting in weaker-than-expected password hashes.

CVE-2005-2946

Default configuration of product uses MD5 instead of stronger algorithms that are available, simplifying forgery of certificates.

CVE-2007-6013

Product uses the hash of a hash for authentication, allowing attackers to gain privileges if they can obtain the original hash.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Potential Mitigations

Phase: Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis.

For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification.

Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak.

Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]

Phase: Architecture and Design

Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. This is especially important for hardware, which can be more difficult to upgrade quickly than software.

Effectiveness: Defense in Depth

Phase: Architecture and Design

Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.

Phase: Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.

Phases: Implementation; Architecture and Design

When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Detection Methods

Automated Analysis

Automated methods may be useful for recognizing commonly-used libraries or features that have become obsolete.

Effectiveness: Moderate

Note: False negatives may occur if the tool is not aware of the cryptographic libraries in use, or if custom cryptography is being used.

Manual Analysis

This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.

Note: These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules.

Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis

  • Binary Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis

  • Binary / Bytecode simple extractor - strings, ELF readers, etc.

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Web Application Scanner

  • Web Services Scanner

  • Database Scanners

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:

  • Man-in-the-middle attack tool

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Framework-based Fuzzer

  • Automated Monitored Execution

  • Monitored Virtual Environment - run potentially malicious code in sandbox / wrapper / virtual machine, see if it does anything suspicious

Effectiveness: High

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:

  • Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source

Effectiveness: High

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:

  • Source code Weakness Analyzer

  • Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer

Effectiveness: High

Automated Static Analysis

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Configuration Checker

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Architecture or Design Review

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:

  • Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction

Cost effective for partial coverage:

  • Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)

Effectiveness: High

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Memberships

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
This MemberOf Relationships table shows additional CWE Categories and Views that reference this weakness as a member. This information is often useful in understanding where a weakness fits within the context of external information sources.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Notes

Maintenance

Since CWE 4.4, various cryptography-related entries, including CWE-327 and CWE-1240, have been slated for extensive research, analysis, and community consultation to define consistent terminology, improve relationships, and reduce overlap or duplication. As of CWE 4.6, this work is still ongoing.

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Taxonomy Mappings

Mapped Taxonomy NameNode IDFitMapped Node Name
CLASP Using a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm
OWASP Top Ten 2004 A8 CWE More Specific Insecure Storage
CERT C Secure Coding MSC30-C CWE More Abstract Do not use the rand() function for generating pseudorandom numbers
CERT C Secure Coding MSC32-C CWE More Abstract Properly seed pseudorandom number generators
The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java (2011) MSC02-J Generate strong random numbers
OMG ASCSM ASCSM-CWE-327

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
References

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Content History

Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Submissions
Submission DateSubmitterOrganization
2006-07-19 CLASP
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Modifications
Modification DateModifierOrganization
2008-08-15 Veracode
Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping
2008-09-08 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2009-01-12 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
2009-03-10 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Potential_Mitigations
2009-07-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Maintenance_Notes, Relationships
2009-10-29 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships
2009-12-28 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated References
2010-02-16 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Detection_Factors, References, Relationships
2010-04-05 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Applicable_Platforms, Potential_Mitigations, Related_Attack_Patterns
2010-06-21 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Common_Consequences, Detection_Factors, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
2010-09-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
2011-03-29 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description
2011-06-01 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2011-06-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships
2011-09-13 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2012-05-11 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated References, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2012-10-30 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Potential_Mitigations
2013-02-21 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships
2014-02-18 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Related_Attack_Patterns
2014-06-23 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships
2014-07-30 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Detection_Factors, Relationships
2015-12-07 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships
2017-01-19 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Related_Attack_Patterns
2017-11-08 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Likelihood_of_Exploit, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2018-03-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated References, Relationships
2019-01-03 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2019-06-20 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships, Type
2020-02-24 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Maintenance_Notes, Relationships
2021-03-15 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated References
2021-10-28 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Maintenance_Notes, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
2022-04-28 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Relationships
2022-10-13 CWE Content Team MITRE
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References
Which of the cryptographic algorithms listed below is the least vulnerable to attacks?
Previous Entry Names
Change DatePrevious Entry Name
2008-04-11 Using a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

More information is available — Please select a different filter.

What are the weakness included in cryptographic failure?

Some of the Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) are: CWE-259: Use of Hard-coded Password, CWE-327: Broken or Risky Crypto Algorithm, and. CWE-331: Insufficient Entropy.

Which of the following authentication protocols offer's countermeasures against replay attacks?

Kerberos protocol prevention The Kerberos authentication protocol includes some countermeasures. In the classic case of a replay attack, a message is captured by an adversary and then replayed at a later date in order to produce an effect.

What type of attacks do Kerberos authentication protect against select all that apply?

What type of attacks do Kerberos authentication protect against? (Select all that apply.) Kerberos protects against replay attacks by timestamping the keys involved. Kerberos protects against man-in-the-middle attacks by performing mutual authentication between the principal and the Application Server (AS).